putting it into words

I live with a committed Republican, so I can see the politics up front, so to speak. But I can’t stomach the party any more — especially after the local Republicans made it very clear to my husband that they didn’t want any moderates (like him) helping. He’d made the mistake of trying to get women and minorities to run as Republican candidates in local elections.

But usually, I don’t think about politics, so it was hard for me to verbalize this recent antagonism to the Republican party. Fortunately, it’s not so difficult for others…

Nov 29, 2003: Why moderates can’t vote Republican any more

Via Atrios, we find this excellent essay by David Neiwert about his personal evolution from a moderate who often voted a split ticket into a straight-ticket Democrat.

He writes about how two watershed moments in the past few years — the Florida recount in the 2000 election and President Bush’s response to the attacks of September 11 — proved to him once and for all that voting for Republicans was simply not possible. According to Neiwert, Republicans have destroyed the possibility of simple civil discourse in politics:

How is any kind of normative political discourse possible in this environment? How is it possible to be civil to people who constantly are placing you under assault? How can there be dialogue when the normative rules of give and take and fair play have not only been flushed down the drain, but chopped into bits and swept out with the tide? Do the advocates of civility place any onus on the nonstop verbal abuse, and absolutely ruthless, win-at-all-costs politics emanating from the conservative quadrant? And do they really expect liberals to refuse to defend themselves, when even doing so gets them accused of further incivility?

I’ll believe conservatives are serious about civil, adult dialogue when they step back and give liberals some breathing room. When "civil" conservatives seriously confront the violent and vicious rhetoric coming from their own quarters; when they do away with suggesting that their political opponents are somehow disloyal Americans; and when they finally acknowledge that people’s concerns about the legitimacy of the process by which Bush obtained office are not only well grounded but driven more by patriotic feeling than partisan rancor — then, perhaps, they can expect to start seeing some civility in return.

It’s a long read, but it just doesn’t get any better than this. And be sure to pass this along to your friends; you can use the "Email to a Friend" link below.

[DNC: Kicking Ass]

3 thoughts on “putting it into words

  1. The hallmark of liberalism is dishonesty. Bill Clinton proved to the left that you can lie your way to the very top and not be challenged by the leftist media. Hitler (who was a socialist)knew that if you told a lie long and hard enough, the dupes, fellow travelers and useful idiots would believe it. That is what the left does with the Florida vote recount. Leftist papers flooded to Florida, recounted every vote and said President Bush won. I feel sorry for the left. Look at the special interests of the left. Isn’t it sad?
    Look at the “leaders” of the left. Bill Clinton, a pathological and/or inveterate lier, Ted Kennedy who got away with murder just because he is a Kennedy and a powerful democrat, Hillary Clinton a visious shrew. Isn’t that sad? Socialism has damaged the economy of every country that played with it. A moderate who cannot vote republican? Give me a break! Another wishy washy nonentity who now would rather be a victim than think and accept personal responsibility. Now he can wallow in his victimhood just like all liberals want to do. Read the Rise and Fall of the Roman Empire. The Clintons and Kennedys will take us there.

  2. Then on the other hand, we have a man whose daddy had to buy him a presidency with his brother’s help, a senator from Mississippi who openly champions one of the most notorious supporters of segregation, and all the liars who railroaded my husband out of the county party chairmanship because he wanted to see more women and minorities in office, and he wasn’t as rabid an antiabortionist as they were.

    I’ll take the liars on the left. At least they act like regular politicians.

    And also, being a vicious shrew isn’t a disqualification for the senate 🙂

  3. Pingback: Ex Cathedra

Comments are closed.